There are different opinions on whether or not history courses should be mandatory for all students, regardless of what they study. Despite the fact that some people think that it is crucial for students to know about history since history repeats itself and can teach a lot, I believe otherwise, maintaining that what happened in the past belongs to the past. In my opinion, requiring all students to take history courses is neither logical nor necessary. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to substantiate my perspective.
Without a doubt, the most consequential reason corroborating my stance on this subject is that universities must keep themselves up to date and make students pick courses that are lucrative to their future and yield them the most recent knowledge and information. For example, nowadays, no matter what your job is, you have to be familiar with programming. When I was studying at university, we were not required to take a programming course, and I had a problem finding a decent job for a long time. Had I been compelled to take a programming course, I would have found my favorite job much sooner. Therefore, this reason manifests that useful classes should be mandatory, not some courses that do not give any fresh information, like history courses.
Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some words here is history courses are so useless since they teach students about the past. Most students do not take these courses seriously and just want to pass them, and not putting too much effort into these courses, students would not get good grades in them, which is a big misfortune. Thus, this point illustrates the fact that history courses not only do not teach students valuable data, but they also negatively affect their grade point average.
All in all, many people are in favor of the idea that the university should make students take history courses as a requirement for graduation. Nevertheless, the foregoing reasons lead us to conclude that neither are history courses effective for students' future, nor do they yield helpful information for them.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- The Plain of Jars is an archaeological site in the Southeast Asian country of Laos At the site hundreds of large stone jars ranging in size from one to three meters are scattered across the countryside These numerous large containers are around 2 000 year 70
- Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A number of proposals involve 63
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line The vessels were about 2 200 years old Each clay jar contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod The a 52
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
There are different opinions on whether or not history courses should be mandatory for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04945054945 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71640372051 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6439932695 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.285714286 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353253562551 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12733993482 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765265297158 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218292151821 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381347919361 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.