International travel is becoming cheaper and countries are opening their door to more and more tourists. Do the advantages of increased tourists outweigh the disadvantages?
It is irrefutable that tourism becomes the backbone of my country and plays an integral part in the economy. Moreover, many countries with lower traveling expenses attract tourists and open their borders to welcome people from different areas. Therefore the positive impacts of international trips far outweigh the drawbacks. Thus, in this essay, I shall elaborate on my point of view by analyzing both sides of the argument before deducing a proper conclusion.
To begin with, first and foremost, international travels boost the economical conditions of the state and provide a vast of job opportunities for unemployed people. Moving further, another pivotal aspect is that international travels are the main way to export cultural values to other regions of the world. For example, if one person travels to another country such as Vietnam, he will be introduced to the culture like the traditional dishes. Then, he comes back to his hometowns and cooks them and spread them to many people. Therefore, all these merits stand in good stead.
On the flip side, one of the most alarming disadvantages is excessive vacationers are damaging the beauty of most tourist attractions due to litter or garbage. For example, if international trips increase high level but travelers do not have an awareness of environmental protection, the beauty of recreation sites can fade gradually and after that, there will be a loss of urban beauty and reduced profits for the tourism industry due to lack of travelers.
On the whole, it is thought that the detrimental impact of being lost the beauty of famous landmarks of the state because of the environmental contamination by the tourists, I strongly believe that the advantageous sides outweigh the drawback in terms of the concerted efforts of both local authority and visitors.
To recapitulate, because of the aforementioned reasons, it is crystal clear that international travels bring lots of benefits to the economic growth of some countries, on the other hand, if the government together with local and foreign people take meaningful actions, the negative effects can be minimized. Therefore, the positive impacts of tourism far outweigh the disadvantages.
- At the present time the population of some countries includes relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people 73
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies 73
- Computers are becoming an essential part of education Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your own opinion 73
- Some businesses say that no one can smoke cigarettes in any of their offices Some governments have banned smoking in all public places Do you agree or disagree with this 84
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should work in any country they wish Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give r 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...to welcome people from different areas. Therefore the positive impacts of international t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...remost, international travels boost the economical conditions of the state and provide a v...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, such as, on the whole, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2905982906 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00470811801 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.8888829528 49.4020404114 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.642857143 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199988982538 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058207178676 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470675129538 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094086887498 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489063077337 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...to welcome people from different areas. Therefore the positive impacts of international t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...remost, international travels boost the economical conditions of the state and provide a v...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, such as, on the whole, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2905982906 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00470811801 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.8888829528 49.4020404114 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.642857143 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199988982538 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058207178676 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470675129538 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094086887498 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489063077337 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.