The given line graph compares the three countries namely USA, Japan, Sweden in term of the number of people who are over 65 from 1940 to 2020 with the projection to 2040.
From basic observation, there has been an upward trend in the percentage of these people of the three countries. Moreover, the figure for Japan witnessed the smallest proportion at the beginning before it is anticipated to have a growth during the last years of the period shown.
In 1940, Starting at approximately 10%, American was the country with the highest percentage of the old people, following by Sweden at about 6% and Japan at 5% respectively. From 1940 to 2000there was gradual leap in the percentage of the elderly in the USA and Sweden and then followed by a steady decline. Whereas, a slight reduction of 3% was seen in the figure for Japan over the same period. From the beginning of 2000 until the present, the number of Swedish elderly population likewise that in USA has had a small jump. By contrast, this figure for USA has witnessed no changes
Over the period of prediction from 2020 to 2040, the proportion of old people in the 3 countries experiences a progress. Especially Japan is planned to upsurge suddenly and become the country with the highest number of the elderly of the three countries at about 27% even though it started at the lowest point of all at the beginning. It is estimated that Sweden stands the second highest at 25% and American ranks the third at about 23%.
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study whereas in other countries students attend university in another city Do you think the benefits of living away from home d 84
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 78
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 56
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...d people in the 3 countries experiences a progress. Especially Japan is planned to upsurge...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, moreover, second, then, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68199233716 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58589752655 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501915708812 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5584877225 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.2 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129135334542 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555253209528 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447268370681 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917057332722 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046167823229 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.