In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response with at least 400 words in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In any field of inquiry, the statement that a beginner is more likely than an expert to make important contributions is debatable. While it could be argued that beginners can bring fresh perspectives and ideas to their field of study, experts are often better equipped with the knowledge and experience necessary for making meaningful advances. Therefore, while both beginners and experts have much to offer in terms of advancing a particular discipline or area of research, I generally disagree with this statement as it implies that one group has an inherent advantage over another.
At first glance, it might seem reasonable to assume that newbies would be more likely than experienced professionals at making significant contributions due to their lack of preconceived notions about how things should work or what solutions may exist within a given problem space. Beginners are unencumbered by past failures which can sometimes hinder progress made by those who have been working on something for too long; they also tend not bring any biases into their approach which allows them explore different avenues without being limited by conventionality or tradition associated with certain areas research . This makes them well-suited for tackling complex problems from novel angles because they don’t feel pressure from having “failed” before – something many seasoned researchers face when trying out new approaches However , even though newcomers may come up some creative solutions , these ideas will only become useful if there's enough expertise available in order put them into practice .
On the other hand ,experts are far better positioned than novices when it comes down actually implementing changes based on innovative thinking . They possess deep understanding related topics under consideration along vast amounts practical experience needed effectively execute proposed plans action ; additionally veteran practitioners typically know where look find resources help advance projects faster since they've already built networks contacts throughout industry who willing lend assistance whenever possible As result all this specialized knowledge acquired through years hard work dedication means chances success increase dramatically when someone highly skilled charge compared somebody just starting out same task
In conclusion , although beginning researchers certainly capable offering unique insights valuable information relevant fields inquiry cannot reasonably expect surpass level output achieved veterans domain due sheer amount time spent mastering subject matter Along these lines my opinion remains firmly rooted idea both groups equally essential achieving ultimate goal progress regardless whether individual novice expert
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-01-19 | carlossouza | 80 | view |
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but the general well being of all its people 79
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers 70
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 83
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 58
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 399 350
No. of Characters: 2321 1500
No. of Different Words: 317 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.469 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.817 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.719 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 196 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 151 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 109 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 70 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 39.9 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 16.164 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.341 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.626 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.066 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5