In the future, there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries. Is it a positive or negative effects.
It is said that in recent times with the development of many countries around the world. Many scientists belive that in the future the percentage of elder people will be higher than young people. Although this trend can have some advantages, the drawbacks may be far more significant. On the one hand, there can be some minor benefits of an enormous proportion of older people. First and foremost, elder people have vast knowledge as well as wisdom which can help them to solve not only problems but also make decisions easier. Therefore, in many big enterprises, the leaders are usually old people because they can convey their knowledge to their employees. Secondly, in many families, grandparents can take care of their grandchildren. As a matter of fact, nowadays, with the fast-paced life parents have to spend many times working. As a consequence, they do not have enough times to care for their children. On the other hand, there can be some major downsides of a high number of old people in many countries. Perhaps one of these is that a high number of younger can directly affect the nation's economy. This means a reduction in the amount of taxes. The reason for this is that when they entire, they can not pay the taxes but the nations also need to invest money in building health care centers as well as provide money for them to live. Furthermore, with many conflicts in the world, the low a number of younger can be very dangerous to the independence of many nations. This is because the younger is not only stronger but also faster than the old, so they can be able to adapt the extreme conditions. In conclusion, it is undeniable that an enormous number of elder people can be beneficial in some situations. However, the drawbacks involved are of greater significance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 56 | view |
- The use of social media such as Facebook and Twitter is replacing face to face contact in everyday life Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 73
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 56
- Some people think that all college students should study whatever they like Others believe they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both of these views and give 73
- Nowadays many families have both parents working Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children while others think childcare centres provide the best care Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1094, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...mber of younger can directly affect the nations economy. This means a reduction in the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75483870968 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66359431059 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503225806452 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5637594968 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7058823529 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234864523614 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802687740849 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103380149503 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234864523614 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1094, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...mber of younger can directly affect the nations economy. This means a reduction in the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75483870968 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66359431059 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503225806452 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5637594968 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7058823529 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234864523614 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802687740849 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103380149503 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234864523614 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.