The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year.
The plans illustrate the southwest of an airport at the moment and a scheme of it after development in the upcoming year.
Overall, the area will be expanded with gates at the outer part and some facilities inside the airport. However, some parts' locations will remain the same.
One of the most significant changes that will take place in the north part of the area is the conversation of the walkway part to the Skytrain feature alongside the expansion of one more beach of gates(10 more gates).
Besides, a bag drop and a Cafe will be constructed on the west side of the interior area. Likewise, on the east side, a car hire section will construct, and its area will be added. Furthermore, a cafe and an ATM will be standing in that part. In addition, it is noticeable that future departures and arrivals gates are planned to build in the northern part of the airport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-08 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-16 | ThHuong | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process of instant noodles 84
- The maps show the changes in the plan of house in 2010 compared to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts show the proportion of male and female employees in different job categories in an engineering company in 2005 and in 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant W
- The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant W
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, likewise, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 723.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63461538462 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59743558104 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7282345682 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.375 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178086875665 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890735302941 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624451487995 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120608521562 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078976902804 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, likewise, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 723.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63461538462 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59743558104 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7282345682 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.375 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178086875665 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890735302941 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624451487995 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120608521562 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078976902804 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.