The line graphs show data on the ownership of household devices and the duration of housework done by families in a country between 1920 and 2019.
Overall, the possession of household machines had significantly increased since 1930, with refrigerators and vacuum cleaners being owned by every family. As a result, the amount of housework needed to be done by people declined proportionately.
Between 1920 and 2019, the line graphs show how household ownership of various electrical appliances and time spent per week doing housework in the country changed. According to the first graph, the proportion of households that own these devices has increased over time, with every family owning both refrigerators and cleaners by 2019. The most significant change – vacuum overall was observed between 1920 and 1960; whereas the proportion of households with fridges increased markedly from nearly none to 90%, the proportion of households with washers and vacuums increased more- modestly, both reaching 70%. Following that, ownership of refrigerators reached 100 percent in 1980, and ownership of 1960 washing machines followed in 2000. Following that, ownership of 1960 washing machines was acquired. Vacuum cleaner ownership fell to around 65 percent in 1980 before recovering and reaching a high of 75 percent in 2019.
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2015 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 44
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010 87
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 204 200
No. of Characters: 1088 1000
No. of Different Words: 109 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.779 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.333 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.859 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 88 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 72 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.206 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.435 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.603 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.139 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4