The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2015. Units are given in percentages.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the percentage of people who was laboring age citizens of four different nations between 1960 and 2050.
Overall, the ratio of the working population in the last year declined compared to the first year, except in the United States which was unchanged. Most of the figures tend to rise then fall, but in Germany there is the opposite trend.
Looking at the graph for more details, the number of people in Germany was slightly higher than that of Japan in 1960. But then 10 years, German citizens dropped significantly to 63%, while Japanese leaped at 68%. Over the next 20 years, instead of going down, the Japanese population has grown to touch the highest point, followed by Germans reaching the second highest level after increasing by 6%. Estimation reveal that these figures will plummet in the future, the lowest is the rate of the Japanese population at 52%.
In the other two trends, the citizens in United States were minimally lower than that of France in the first year. Twenty years later, there was a remarkable surge in the number of workers of both countries to about 66%, however, the proportion of laboring age adults began to fluctuate and slipped back to 64% in the year 2020. According to current prediction, in the United States that population will crash to 60% and in France it will tumble to 57% in the final year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-18 | Giang Tran | 44 | view |
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 73
- The diagram below shows how one type of coal is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table The table shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Many countries have the same shops and products Some consider it a positive development whereas others consider it negative Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and 56
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'reveals'.
Suggestion: reveals
...evel after increasing by 6%. Estimation reveal that these figures will plummet in the ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81434599156 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36338149962 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573839662447 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1833295981 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.1 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.091308527715 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337058384124 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381646946779 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0618791800468 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039056546517 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.