Many people argue that increasing the price of fuel is the most effective measure to address the problems of the environment. While this approach can potentially reduce emissions by encouraging individuals to use fewer private vehicles, I believe that a global awareness campaign would be a more practical way to address the root causes of environmental problems.
On the one hand, raising fuel costs might decrease the amount of carbon dioxide emitted in cities to a certain extent. In reality, vehicles release vast amounts of noxious fumes into the atmosphere every second, contributing to air pollution. These fumes contain a variety of harmful chemicals, such as nitrogen oxides and particulate matter, which have negative impacts on the environment. Requiring individuals to pay more for their journeys can encourage them to rely less on their private vehicles, and to use more environmentally-friendly modes of transportation, such as public transport or electric bikes. Following the Singapore government's 20% increase in fuel prices in 2018, the Land Transport Authority reported a 2.2% increase in bus ridership in the first quarter compared to the same period in 2017. Consequently, harmful emissions will be limited, leading to less air pollution.
However, this measure does not fully address the underlying causes of environmental problems. Furthermore, these issues can stem from various factors, including the use of plastic bags while shopping or the use of noxious chemicals in the agricultural and industrial sectors, contaminating both land and water. Therefore, the most effective approach would be running a worldwide program to raise consumers' awareness of the importance of environmental costs. According to the Land Transport Authority, after the Singaporean government implemented a 20% increase in fuel prices in 2018, there was a 2.2% increase in daily bus ridership in the first quarter compared to the same period in 2017. This can consequently limit harmful emissions, leading to a lower air pollution rate.
In conclusion, while increasing fuel prices can cut emissions to some extent by discouraging individuals from using private vehicles, a global awareness campaign will be a more effective measure to mitigate the underlying causes of this problem. I am also convinced that once this approach is implemented, there will be more people perceiving the importance of environmental protection, contributing to the reduction of environmental issues.
- Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 73
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 84
- Some people say that to prevent illness and disease governments should focus more on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55672823219 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25281128461 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509234828496 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.3706855071 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.4 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2666666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153702642717 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550182948193 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500870806736 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107592952053 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237016035454 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55672823219 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25281128461 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509234828496 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.3706855071 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.4 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2666666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153702642717 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550182948193 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500870806736 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107592952053 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237016035454 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.