The line graph shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015
The line graph gives information about the percentages of domestic recycling waste in the UK, Germany and France from 2005 to 2015.
Overall, the household rates in the UK and France showed a significant rise, whereas the percentage of recycling in Germany saw a downward trend.
In 2005, the household recycling percentages in the UK and France were 35% and 20% respectively. However, the percentage of recycling waste in France experienced a dramatic increase and surpassed the data of Germany in 2009. During 2009 to 2011 the recycling rate in France went up steadily and reached to over 55% in 2015. In the same time, after a steady 2-year-period, the domestic recycling rate in the UK soared up to 55% in 2011 an gradually increased to 60% in the end of the period.
According to the graph, Germany was the country which had the highest rate of household recycling, at 50%. However, the period between 2005 and 2013 saw a dramatically decline to 30% and slightly rose to 40% in2015. Therefore, Germany became the least domestic-recycling-percentage nation among the three countries in the and of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...rate in the UK soared up to 55% in 2011 an gradually increased to 60% in the end o...
^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...r, the period between 2005 and 2013 saw a dramatically decline to 30% and slightly rose to 40% in2015....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30226785347 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508021390374 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8021405677 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334554293995 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138091107037 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579892076593 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208191501094 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383428638332 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.