The given table compares six nations in terms of the amount of waste production between the years 1980 and 2000
It is noticeable from the table that America saw by far the highest levels of the tones of waste output in three separate years. On the other hand, Korea is the only country to reduce its waste each year over this twenty-year period.
Between 1980 and 2010, the number of waste in the US increased from 1931 to 192 million tonnes. Similarly, this rising trend was seen in Japan, Portugal, and Poland. Japan’s waste output grew from 28 to 53 million tonnes while the figure for Portugal and Poland went up from 2 to 5 and 4 to 6.6 million tonnes, respectively.
The trends for Ireland and Korea were different from those described above. From 1980 and 2000, Ireland experienced about an eightfold rise, from 0.6 to 5 million tonnes. By contrast, there was a significant decrease in the number of waste material in Korea, from 31 in 1990 to above half, 19 million tonnes in 2000.
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 67
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries in three different years over a twenty year period 89
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 67
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62711864407 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37538205599 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61581920904 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5990613257 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.375 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290292207765 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113285939372 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10002916865 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186243352589 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937663439159 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.