The assigned tabular chart illustrate the information about four indicators in the area of social and econoimic for Canada,Japan,Peru,Zaire in 1994 by the support of United Nations statistics.
It's clear that Japan and Canada have far more annual income per person than Peru and Zaire in 1994, as well as indicator in other three indicators. In the meantime, Zaire stood at the same level compared with Peru in most indicators, except for adult literacy rate, which was the lowest in four countries.
Japan reached to the top in fours countries in annual income with a figure of 15760 dollars per person. Followed by Cananda, which nearly 4000 dollars lose than Japan. However, Peru and Zaire had a sharp slumppet compared to Japan, with figures of 160 and 130 dollars per person, respectively. In aspect of adult literacy rate, nearly all adult accept literacy in Japan and Canada. which is opposite of Peru and Zaire, to be specific, only 34% adult have literacy in Zaire, which is half rate than Peru.
In terms of daily calorie supply, Canada stood at the first in daily calorie supply with a figure of 3326, approximately 500 calorie more than Japan, Peru and Zaire reminded at a low level of calorie supply per person, all were under 2000 calorie. Whatelse, in terms of life expectancy at birth, People in Japan live longest among four conturies, with a figure of 78 years old, which was two years longer than Cananda, Peru and Zaire have a similar life expentancy at birth, 51 and 47 years old, respectively.
- Consumption of meat The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- Consumption of meat The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The table below gives information about the weekly consumption of ordinary milk and butter and high and low fat alternatives of milk and butter among different age groups in one European country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the mai 67
- The Maps below gives information on the Village Park ten years ago and now 84
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
use 'additionally'…
use 'additionally' illustrate remnant infors
a sharp slump
'which was half rate of Peru' rather not 'which is half rate than Peru'
ranked top or stood at the top among the four countries
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Japan
... area of social and econoimic for Canada,Japan,Peru,Zaire in 1994 by the support of Un...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Zaire
...cial and econoimic for Canada,Japan,Peru,Zaire in 1994 by the support of United Nation...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...lt accept literacy in Japan and Canada. which is opposite of Peru and Zaire, to be sp...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h is half rate than Peru. In terms of daily calorie supply, Canada stood at th...
^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'calorie' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'calories'.
Suggestion: calories
...ith a figure of 3326, approximately 500 calorie more than Japan, Peru and Zaire reminde...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, well, except for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88076923077 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65772013789 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4166644415 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.9 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0935431271703 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487845530152 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076874417452 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096283984181 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989581358436 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.