Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure how they respond to specifics presented in the reading passage.
Both the reading passage and the talk discuss the desertifications and the use of box-shaped devices around the young trees as and solution to avoid drying. The reading mentions some of the negative reasons which reject this box-shaped diveses benefites, on the other hand the professor points out other convincing ideas to support their efficiencies.
At first, according to the passage these devices costs huge amount of money that is not possible for some government to allocate budget for milions of trees. However the lecturer rejects this reason, she believes that these devices just use for young trees and when they grow enough people can reuse them for other trees, this process can reapet about twenty times. then it can be practical solution to use the box-shaped devices.
Secondely, the article points out that local people who are living in the places that affected by harsh desetrification, most of the time have difficulty for finding food, so they cannot ask them to install these devices that are not usable for their food productions. Conversely, the speaker contended this argument, she is of the opinion that governments can encourage citizens by some awars, like allowing them to use these devices for their plant. as a result, it allows them to provide more food and the branches of other protective trees as a fire wood which is beneficial.
At last, based on the authors belief, the ability of devices to conserving water is limited, so, it can usable just for small trees, if the trees becom bigger and the rain stopfor six month, then they are not survive. In other hand, the professor challenge this belief, she mention that, when this devices use for young trees, therefor their root grows and reach the lowest level of ground where is water available, as a result, during the time when they've got larger they have not any challenges.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...n to avoid drying. The reading mentions some of the negative reasons which reject this box-...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...o allocate budget for milions of trees. However the lecturer rejects this reason, she b...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
... process can reapet about twenty times. then it can be practical solution to use the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...m to use these devices for their plant. as a result, it allows them to provide mor...
^^
Line 7, column 23, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...is beneficial. At last, based on the authors belief, the ability of devices to conse...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...s becom bigger and the rain stopfor six month, then they are not survive. In other ha...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'survived'.
Suggestion: survived
...in stopfor six month, then they are not survive. In other hand, the professor challenge...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
...he professor challenge this belief, she mention that, when this devices use for young t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 294, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nge this belief, she mention that, when this devices use for young trees, therefor t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 451, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...able, as a result, during the time when theyve got larger they have not any challenges...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, second, so, then, as to, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96496815287 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49669545078 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535031847134 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7888970125 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.9 110.228320801 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4 21.698381199 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0792650357223 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363117436119 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233909228796 0.0662205650399 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0545399844613 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248172767301 0.0443174109184 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 53.8541721854 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.