The graph illustrates shifts in the amount of fast food consumed in the UK from 1970 to 1990
Overall, the UK population tends to eat more and more junk food. In addition, fish and chips were the most popular product.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, in 1970, pizza was common fast food in the UK, and 300 grams were consumed per week. However, the figure for it fell dramatically to nearly 200 grams in 1990. In contrast, there was a considerable rise in fish and chips and hamburger. This time witnessed a rapid growth in hamburger, from 20 grams to 300 grams per week, surpassing pizza at the end of 1985. The quantity of fish and chips products jumped enormously from approximately 100g to 500g in 1990.
Accompanying the change in these three types of fast food was an overall increase in the amount of junk food eaten. In 1970, British consumers ate around 400g per week but later climbed to nearly 1000g in 1990.
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 84
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 73
- The table below shows the prices of a cup of coffee in 6 cities in Australia in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- the table below gives information about changes in models of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5843373494 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48260752182 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572289156627 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0826833208 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5555555556 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0297270648045 0.215688989381 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0117639050353 0.103423049105 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0169604467099 0.0843802449381 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0214908687629 0.15604864568 14% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238041722697 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.