The line graph illustrates the proportion of people who visited cinemas once or more than once a month during a 19-year period starting from 1984.
Overall, the percentage of cinema visitors of all ages witnessed an increase, despite some fluctuations. Besides, there were more people aged 15 to 24 visiting cinemas, in comparison with those in the other age groups.
In 1984, over 15% of people between 15 and 24 years old went to the cinema once a month or more, as opposed to a mere 2% of visitors aged 35 and over. During the given period, an erratic pattern was seen in the figure for the 15-to 24-year-old age group which rose steadily to approximately 35% in 1992, before fluctuating wildly and standing at above 50% in 2003. Meanwhile, a consistent growth was seen in the percentage of visitors who are 35 years old and older, with roughly 15% recorded in the last year.
Turning to the remaining age groups, 10% people aged 7 to 14 visited cinemas in the first year, which was about twice higher than the percentage of 25-to 35-year-old visitors. From 1984 onwards, those figures fluctuated widely and both stopped at 30% at the end of the period.
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Newzealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph shows the percentage of visiting the cinema once a month or more between 1984 to 2000 4 age groups Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... was seen in the percentage of visitors who are 35 years old and older, with roughly 15...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57481422172 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605911330049 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8041547868 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.625 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244871629945 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118776770476 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770626097092 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172801477544 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537074853192 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.