In the digital age, it is widely held that videos are more useful in comprehending the diverse lifestyles of people around the world, compared to written papers. While I agree that video documentaries can hold some advantages, I do not agree that it is superior than written ones.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that video records are visually informative and takes minimum effort to produce. The first worth-mentioning fact is that sometimes written papers are not able to convey all the backgrounds and activities within our daily lives but with videos, we can view the contents clearly. For example, it will be easier to understand the way a person in other part of the world dances by watching a documentary, rather than reading a description. Furthermore, technological advancement has allowed us to film a lengthy video just by our smartphones or tablets, which are more convienient and less time-consuming than producing written papers. In addition, we can capture everything we observe at the moment without having to memorize it.
On the other hand, I believe that written documents bring about an immense amount of positive impact that can not be replaced by other tools. It is clear that before electronic devices and cameras are invented, every knowledge about the way of living that the prior generation has perceived is written in books and journals. Thus, these papers contain valuable sources of information and hold historical meanings in terms of the global culture.
As a result, we should research and study carefully about these documents before digital ones. Moreover, in written papers, all the thoughts and opinions of the authors are depicted within the words, which can be more informative and insightful than typical videos. Hence, it is more worthwile for students or researchers to learn about other cultures through the pages.
In conclusion, while some individuals regard videos as a more effective method to learn about other parts of the world rather than written papers, I would advocate that studying the diverse ways of living via writtings is the most favourable practice.
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today Some people think that it will improve people s lives in many ways Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...ges, I do not agree that it is superior than written ones. On the one hand, it is...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18023255814 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83553491386 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4689756563 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.285714286 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340121485877 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104102934031 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750241687553 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190326234198 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539997083109 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.