The graph below shows the employment rate of each gender in four different countries in 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the occupation chances in percentage between men and women in four different nations in the year 2002. In general, most of male gender had a greater opportunity rate in employment than female in all countries that were mentioned. In addition, Norway gained the highest work-ratio whilst South Africa was the opposite trend which was the smallest proportion of occupation. Therefore, Norway was the best place to apply for jobs and almost recruiters tended to choose men for work as they were more suitable for the nature of jobs than women.
It is easy to see that Norway peaked the top at nearly 80% in male ratio and about 75% in female one. The proportions of employed Chilean and Finish men were close behind at roughly 70%, though the employed-men rate in Chile was still little higher. By contrast, Finish women had more opportunity rate which accounted for almost a half of Chilean women, by 68% and 32%. There was a similar pattern in South Africa that men employment ratio was the dominant and also got the lowest point, which made up exactly 50%. Whereas it was not the bottom and slight higher 5% than Chilean women, with 37%. There were big differential employment rate between male and female in Chile and South Africa while the percentages in two last countries, Finland and Norway, did not have too much disparity at all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-30 | Trangg Changg | 72 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Nguyễn Thạch Bảo Ngọc | view | |
| 2023-01-26 | Nguyễn Thạch Bảo Ngọc | view | |
| 2022-08-03 | rachell | 56 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, therefore, whereas, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81196581197 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46943474704 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581196581197 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5556651015 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.6 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0867703480777 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040068206789 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442286199815 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748024731301 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136241339429 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.