Some people think that only society should be responsible for any anti social activities What are the causes for these activities Who is responsible for them

It’s very distinctly that a lot of people start having anti-social behaviors and becoming disrespectful to others nowadays. This phenomenon wasn't popular in the past, as you can easily hear a heart-warmed story from our grandparents and parents' mouths. There must be some causes for this situation.
Time flies, and a lot of things have changed significantly since the invention of the Internet. The convenience of the Internet makes social media a must-have ” object” in this modern world. Communicating through Messenger, Instagram, Whatsapp, … is preferred by a lot of people as it doesn’t require complicated skills like body language, eye contact, or gestures,...to make others grasp the means. Moreover, with a person who really isn't confident in their appearance, face-to-face communication is such a terrible idea. They must feel more comfortable when they can “hide” after those platforms but still don’t get away from normal life. And when “the good examples” is pervasive on the Internet, peer pressure appears everywhere. People tend to compare themselves with those examples and then feel self-deprecating. The less confidence they have in themselves, the more anti-social they become.
On the other hand, the Internet also makes some people overestimate themself. It all starts when they can achieve so much information just by surfing on Facebook or listening to the Radio. They can feel like they have a lot of knowledge in so many fields, and they can be misunderstood that they’re professional too. And this leads to disrespect or even pride with others.
Hence, the Internet is the main factor that causes anti-social and disrespectful behaviors in lots of people these days in my opinion. So what is the solution now, when the Internet is so important to replace or eraser? This is the problem with what those people think, like we can’t force a person who is not confident to become love themselves just by words. But we can reduce this by a proper education from a young age. So do with those unrespectful manners.
Arrive at conclusion, this phenomenon is unavoidable in any society or any age of times. It’s merely become more and more popular by the impact of the Internet, but I think it’s still in the control. Trying not to be one of them is the simplest thing you can do right now.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ful to others nowadays. This phenomenon wasnt popular in the past, as you can easily ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...Internet makes social media a must-have ” object” in this modern world. Communica...
^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
... makes social media a must-have ” object” in this modern world. Communicating thr...
^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... body language, eye contact, or gestures,...to make others grasp the means. Moreov...
^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ans. Moreover, with a person who really isnt confident in their appearance, face-to-...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, really, so, still, then, i think, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08031088083 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.968777407 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559585492228 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1961540382 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2608695652 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7826086957 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65217391304 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139658099504 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432119536051 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593156727563 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880072277139 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449085351678 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.