The table below shows the percentage of students in a particular country who enjoy learning history, find it boring, or find it challenging at different levels of education. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the proportion of students a specific nation who were interested in studying history, found it boring or found it difficult at different levels of education.
As can be seen from the table, when the level of grade increased, the ratio of students who like learning history declined while the data of students who weren't into history went up. In addition, students at elementary school thought history challenging the most whereas students at middle school and high school reckoned history difficult at the same level.
To begin with, students at elementary school enjoy studying history most with 40% whereas students at high school like history least, with 25%. When students grew up, the data of student who do not like history rose from 30% to 50%.
On the other hand, it is most difficult for students at elementary school to learn history, with 30%. This figure for students who think it's not easy to study history at middle school and high school are equally with 25%, which was the lowest figure.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 61
- The maps show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 67
- In some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be case Do you think this is positive or negative situation 56
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasizes that their product are new in some way Why is it Do you think it is positive or negative development 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...declined while the data of students who werent into history went up. In addition, stud...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99421965318 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39423612055 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543352601156 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0975317465 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.428571429 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225617431456 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127642533761 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343999693579 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160012113757 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401007797552 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.