The reading passage presents the views of scientists who believe environmental pollution is the primary cause of the rapid decline in sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast. The lecturer, however, asserts that recent investigations have shown that predation is more likely to be the main cause.
First, according to the article, it is water pollution caused by oil rigs and other industrial chemicals that has led to deathly infections in the otter. The speaker cites the fact that no dead sea otters have been found near the shore, suggesting their deaths couldn’t be blamed on the environment. On the contrary, the predation hypothesis goes more consistently with this observation.
Second, although the scientists in the reading hold a strong belief that pollution is the reason why the populations of sea otters and other sea mammals were negatively affected, the professor doesn't think the same. He points out that the orca's main prey - the whale - have disappeared from the location due to human activities. This explains why the orca have had to hunt other smaller mammals for survival, thus causing their populations to drop simultaneously.
Third, while the scientists use ocean currents and other environmental factors to explain the uneven concentrations of otter populations along the coast, the lecturer states this unusual pattern can be better unraveled by the predation hypothesis. To be specific, Alaskan locations where the otter populations decreased are also places where it is easy for the orca to get access to. In contrast, in shallow and rocky locations, it is challenging for the orca to approach, so the number of sea otters along the coast doesn’t seem to decrease.
- TPO 41 integrated writing 80
- TPO 40 Integrated Writing Task 45
- TPO 44 Integrated Writing Task 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed towards young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- TPO 60 35
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 12
No. of Words: 276 250
No. of Characters: 1391 1200
No. of Different Words: 158 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.076 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.04 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.798 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 74 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.091 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.921 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.727 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.37 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.625 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.069 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4