The maps below show university sports courts in 1990 and now. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps depict how the university sporting facilities looked like in 1990 and how they have changed since then.
Overall, it is clear that indoor activities venues have been merged under one roof, while outer space was transformed into a couple of sporting courts at the expense of a car park as well as a greenery. To further diversify workout options for students, a fitness centre was added, so as a changing room enlarged.
Previously, the university sporting site consisted of a tennis court together with an outdoor pool positioned alongside a set of separate buildings, such as reception, cafe, and a locker room. However, the remaining space did not offer any exercise grounds, being occupied by a green park with some parking slots directly below it.
Presently, the reception entrance abutting to the cafeteria remain unaltered, although, both are now a part of the roof-covered complex. Furthermore, to fit in the new structure, the swimming pool was moved inside the premises. The current set-up includes a larger zone for locker rooms that is positioned between the newly built gym and the pool. Nevertheless, the most notable change is renovation of the outdoor area where the garden grounds were replaced by a basketball court, while the tennis playground was doubled in size at the expense of the parking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
- Many people think that students learn course materials more effectively by taking exams while others think that students learn more effectively by doing other activities like completing projects Which one do you think is more effective 90
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- More educators these days are using technology in the classroom In fact many teachers now record their lectures upload them on a website and ask students to watch them before their lesson During class students report on the lectures and discuss them toget 90
- Is it more enjoyable to work only 3 days a week for short hours or to work 5 days a week for longer hours 60
- The maps show changes that took place on the island 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.100456621 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74447837447 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684931506849 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9429359552 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.111111111 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116362821386 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411001782733 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401583291896 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0720836325439 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345122492852 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.