Over the past decades, food-associated issues have never failed to draw a public attention and provoke debates. It is universally acknowledged that a rising number of people prefer to consume a good is made from another nations than in their local area. In my opinion, this trend could have both positive or negative development impact in equal measure.
On the one hand, the trend that a variety of consumers are purchasing food which is grew from different countries instead of their nation could bring several possible benefits for individual and national society. On the individual level, this trend could likely to offer a range of diversity food from distinct countries to consumers. People, for instance, have opportunities to try the food such as apples, strawberries and so forth from the America or the China. It, thereby, could support local people gaining more about the goods from different areas. From the national society perspective, the trend that an increase rate of local human buying food come from other regions is a significant factor to the import companies. This tendency can contribute to grow up the financial of the import industries, and therefore aid their country in enhancing economic.
On the other hand, the above-mentioned arguments can be considered from the opposite angle. The first and foremost disadvantage is that the percentage of consuming in the local nation is decreased, and thereby could put financial burdens on the local famers. They could not sale their goods, which effects on their economic and their life quality, as a result. Another drawback worth noting is that the value of the nutrition which are imported from other regions are no guaranteed would have unforeseen dangerous influences on health. A fake rice, for example, could trigger the health of consumer comprising food poisoning or even death.
In conclusion, it appears to me that the trend of a rising number of consumers tend to buying food from other foreign could exert both equally beneficial and detrimental implications on residents and society. While this trend could enable offering multiform food from a range of regions to local people and growing up economic to the business, it is cause the reducing of life quality rooted in put monetary on the food workers and this trend is responsible for the health of residents by virtue of the poor quality of nourishments.
- Nowadays more and more jobs and tasks are done by machines which involves hard physical work Do these positive of trend outweigh the negative effects 84
- In many countries people like to eat a wider variety of food than can be grown in their local area As a result much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- In many countries people like to eat a wider variety of food than can be grown in their local area As a result much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
... consumers are purchasing food which is grew from different countries instead of the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14066496164 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77100030861 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516624040921 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.031473332 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.625 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4375 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29772396775 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995666233726 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419762657502 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18718769642 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378720707348 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.