Task 1: (Map) The plans below show how the ground of a particular building has changed over time. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features.
The diagram illustrates the layout of the ground floor of the building as it had been in 1958,1984 and 1985,2000 and how the same area will look from 2001 to the present after having been developed.
In general, the area had undergone drastic changes in facilities. The most significant difference could be seen in the removal of the particular building and the construction of new facilities.
As its original state, there was a line with myriad facilities on the left and right such as a meeting room, assistant, and secretary office on the left. Furthermore, a kitchen and manager office on the right, while a toilet and reception area was located proximity close to the entrance.
In the following 25 years, all the rows on the left of the apartment, as demolished to make way for the construction of a living room and bathroom, and shower. Additionally, the manager's office and reception area was removed to build bedroom 1 and 2. The remaining feature stayed unchanged.
From 2001 until the present, another transformation could be seen in the removal of the living room to erect gift cards and flower areas, while the bathroom and shower were devastated to put up a new play area. Moreover, bedroom 1 and 2 was destroyed to pave the way for a new office and flower area, while the kitchen still remained over the period.
- It is said that people s life now is becoming more and more stressful What do you think are the cause of this What solutions can you suggest 73
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 67
- the diagram below shows how instant noddles are manufactured 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'managers'' or 'manager's'?
Suggestion: managers'; manager's
...bathroom, and shower. Additionally, the managers office and reception area was removed t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...changed. From 2001 until the present, another transformation could be seen in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, moreover, still, while, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82608695652 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76497127699 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7150848399 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0722290309743 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332753555347 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302116872168 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0446567080441 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325972075632 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.