The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The graph shows how the amount of goods transported in the UK changed over a 28-year period across four different modes of transportation.
Overall, there was a clear upward trend in the amount of goods transported by each mode. Road transportation was by far the most popular mode, with the amount of goods transported increasing steadily from 70 tonnes in 1974 to just under 100 tonnes in 2002. This mode consistently ranked first throughout the entire 28-year period.
Pipeline and water transportation showed similar patterns from 1974 to 1990, with fluctuations occurring in the following years. The amount of goods transported by pipeline increased gradually in the first four years but remained the lowest of all modes throughout the 28-year period. The amount of goods transported by water was higher than pipeline in 1974, and rose to 40% in 1978. Both modes experienced a surge four years later, with pipeline transportation increasing from 5 to 15 tonnes, and water transportation growing by 20% compared to the previous year. The data for both modes remained unchanged for ten years until the amount of waterway goods went downward in 1998 before rising again. The amount of goods transported by pipeline surpassed 20 in 1994 and remained unchanged for nearly eight years.
The data for goods delivered by road and rail were roughly the same for 24 years, with a slight difference between 1974 and 1978. The amount of cargo transported by road returned to the starting point of nearly 50 tonnes in 1978, while the amount of rail goods dropped by half in the next four years. Both modes fluctuated from 1986 to 2002, with the amount of cargo rising to over 80 tonnes and slightly dropping before reaching approximately 100 tonnes. The amount of rail goods experienced the same fluctuation style and surpassed 40 tonnes in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | cookie12 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-10 | taocute.s1 | 74 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | Roy An | 11 | view |
- Some people think that good health is a basic human need so medical services should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Internet is becoming a dominant element in modern life What are the ad vantages and disadvantages of the Internet 67
- Modern technology has greatly influenced people s ways of entertainment making people less creative Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people say the fashion industry has a bad effect on people s lives Do you agree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ined unchanged for nearly eight years. The data for goods delivered by road and ra...
^^^
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...light difference between 1974 and 1978. The amount of cargo transported by road ret...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 33.7804878049 186% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 965.302439024 159% => OK
No of words: 306.0 196.424390244 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01960784314 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75704682397 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457516339869 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8990755416 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.714285714 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253007682227 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113471673574 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617422092061 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197257250503 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539049915191 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.