The given diagram expresses the percentage of energy capacity in gigawatts (GW) in 2015, along with the projections for 2040.
At a glance, it is predicted that in 2040, almost types of energy would decrease with the exception of wind and solar power. Additionally, in 2040, fossil fuels are expected to hit the highest point, and nuclear power is forecast to supplant solar energy to become the lowest point.
In 2015, fossil fuels accounted for two-thirds (64%) of the chart and approximately doubled as much as other renewables; whereas; the figure for solar, wind, and nuclear energy reserved a minority part of the chart at 2%, 5%, and 6% respectively. In addition, it was extremely easy to see that the rates for solar energy hit the bottom.
In 2040, it is expected that while the proportion of solar and wind power would experience an upward tendency of 16% and 7% respectively, the rest would drop. By contrast, fossil fuel power would peak at approximately half (44%). Furthermore, with only 5%, it is suggested that nuclear power would replace solar energy and hit the lowest point.
- There are severe social consequences of housing shortages in cities and only the government can solve these problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- There are severe social consequences of housing shortages in cities and only the government can solve these problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 73
- There are severe social consequences of housing shortages in cities and only the government can solve these problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
..., almost types of energy would decrease with the exception of wind and solar power. Additionally, in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ates for solar energy hit the bottom. In 2040, it is expected that while the pro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, third, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90810810811 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7009724191 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535135135135 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2541975859 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277498254383 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130613877355 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115588325297 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2019127385 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122116259765 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.