The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban, rural and town between 1995 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
In 1995 60% of people born outside of Australia lived in cities, 40% lived in rural areas while only about 10% lived in towns. For people born in Australia, however, city-live was not as common. Only 50% of them lived in cities, while the percentage of people living in smaller towns was higher at 20%. People born in Australia were less likely to live in rural areas than people born in other parts of the world.
By 2010 the situation had clearly changed both for people born in Australia and in the rest of the world. The number of people living in cities had sky-rocketed. For people born in Australia it increased to a little over 60% and for people with origins outside of Australia to 80%. At the same time living in smaler towns and rural areas became less common. About 10% of people of both groups lived in towns. The difference between people born in Australia and elsewhere becomes clear, however, when you look at the number of people living in rural areas. Approximately 15% of people with Australian roots, still live in rural areas. Meanwhile, for people with origins outside of Australia this number has dropped to less than 10%. This is an interesting change to 1995, when people born outside of Australia were more likely to live in rural areas, than people with origins in Australia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | Linh12324r | view |
- Computers are now the basis of the modern world They should therefore be introduced into classrooms and their programs used for direct teaching purposes However dependence on computers in teaching may carry a certain degree of risk to students Discuss bot 78
- Nowadays sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sports people and companies involved both financially and other ways Is this a positive or negative development for sports 73
- As parts of education students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its language and culture To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 72
- Some people believe that planning for the future is a waste of time because they think that focusing on the present is more important To what extent agree or disagree 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68260869565 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31744024746 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421739130435 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9040721928 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8461538462 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6923076923 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38461538462 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391657355201 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180333311909 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089236955917 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.349503240904 0.15604864568 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00582240813326 0.0819641961636 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.61 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68260869565 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31744024746 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421739130435 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9040721928 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8461538462 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6923076923 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38461538462 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391657355201 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180333311909 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089236955917 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.349503240904 0.15604864568 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00582240813326 0.0819641961636 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.61 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.