The pie chart illustrate how different industry sectors contributed the economy of Turkey in the years 2000 and 2017. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that Finance, Trade, Manufacturing and Construction experienced an upward trend while Agriculture, Government, Leisure and hosipility show a declining tendency. It is also worth noticing that Healthcare and Education witnessed a stable remain throughout the whole period.
Looking at more detail, the segment of economic’s contribution by construction experiened a significant increase of 7% from 3% in 2000 to 10% in 2017. Standing at 5% and 14% in 2000, the figure for Turkey’s economy contribution by finance and trade winessed a marginally rise of 3% and 2% respectively in 2017. Regarding manufacturing, this category also saw a slight increase of 4% in two years, from 8% in 2000
A downward trend, however, was recorded for the contribution to the financial prudence of Turkey by Agriculture. This category accounted for the largest 24% of the total Turkey’s economy contributed in 2000, following by a significant decline to 14% in 2017. The similar pattern was seen in Government and Leisure and hospitality
The pie charts illustrate how different industry sectors contributed to the economy of Turkey in the years 2000 and 2017. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that Finance, Trade, Manufacturing, and Construction experienced an upward trend while Agriculture, Government, Leisure, and hospitality show a declining tendency. It is also worth noticing that Healthcare and Education witnessed a stable remain throughout the whole period.
Looking at more detail, the segment of economic’s contribution by construction experienced a significant increase of 7% from 3% in 2000 to 10% in 2017. Standing at 5% and 14% in 2000, the figure for Turkey’s economic contribution by finance and trade witnessed a marginal rise of 3% and 2% respectively in 2017. Regarding manufacturing, this category also saw a slight increase of 4% in two years, from 8% in 2000
A downward trend, however, was recorded for the contribution to the financial prudence of Turkey by Agriculture. This category accounted for the largest 24% of the total Turkey’s economy contributed in 2000, followed by a significant decline to 14% in 2017. A similar pattern was seen in Government and Leisure and hospitality
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-01 | copedanghọchanhchamchi | 84 | view |
- choose a device that you use in your daily life
- The pie chart illustrate how different industry sectors contributed the economy of Turkey in the years 2000 and 2017 Looking from an overall perspective it is readily apparent that Finance Trade Manufacturing and Construction experienced an upward trend w 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ease of 4% in two years, from 8% in 2000 A downward trend, however, was recorded ...
^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n Government and Leisure and hospitality
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4126984127 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33656515875 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57671957672 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7282002541 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.875 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47330286539 0.215688989381 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184618515732 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16673074604 0.0843802449381 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303315260527 0.15604864568 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.18558300329 0.0819641961636 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.