The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares how many tourists visited a particular Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, it can be seen that a particular Caribbean island attracted more visitors over the given period which was illustrated by all categories experiencing an upward trend. Additionally, the figure for visitors staying on cruise ships was highest nearly the entire time before being surpassed by that of visitors staying on island by the end of the period.
To begin with, in 2010, the total was 1 million tourists who chose to pay a visit to a particular Caribbean island, and then the figure for visitors who chose to stay on cruise ships remained steady at 0.75 million while there was a slight increase from 0.25 million to 0.5 million in the quantity of tourists staying on island.
Meanwhile, between 2013 and 2015, those staying on the island plateaued at 1.5 million and then fluctuated at this level until the end of time surveyed. At the same time, cruise ships passengers rose steadily, surpassing those who chose to pay a visit on cruise ships through 2015 and reaching 2 million in 2017.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | RIYA MODI | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | dhphuc7866 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | rumpul4skin | view | |
| 2023-08-15 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | NgoMinhTriet | 84 | view |
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Task 1 The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 73
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quantity of tourists staying on island. Meanwhile, between 2013 and 2015, those ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93617021277 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55974336649 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.5517934255 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.666666667 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166718805721 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104943009757 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996848137625 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13984778791 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105240202153 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.