The given line graph illustrates the amount of fish and three sorts of meat consumed per person weekly in a European nation during the period between 1979 and 2004.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the figures of the chicken’s consumption witnessed upward trajectories throughout the period in question, while the opposite was not true for beef, lamp and fish. In addition, chicken tended to replace beef as the first choice of consumers in the second half of the period.
In terms of the utilization of fish and three different types of meat in the year 1979, there has been the lowest figure in the quantity of fish’s consumption, while this counted double for chicken and lamb, with the former at roughly 140 grams and the latter at precisely 150 grams. Besides, the grams of beef was absorbed approximately at 220 grams per head per week as the highest data.
Looking at the grams of beef and chicken eaten in the year 2004, there has been a dramatic decline in the ingestion of beef, whereas the amount of chicken recorded a significant increase to the end of period at around 240 grams. Moreover, fish was still the least favorite food for purchasers, achieved its trough of about 30 grams in 1999 and finished at nearly 40 grams in 2004.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport and music and others are not However it is sometimes clamed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or a musician Discuss both these vi 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, still, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79820627803 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5264432314 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57399103139 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.4859167807 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.857142857 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8571428571 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 5.23603664747 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111107542959 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560351636587 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630994090363 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837351744005 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640777037522 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.