Topic: More government investment should be on the teaching of science than any other subjects in order to keep a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are some people supporting the heavy government’s subsidy on science-related subjects rather than on the remaining ones, as they believe such financial allocation would facilitate economic enhancement of a nation. However, in my opinion, whether to allocate more money on scientific fields or the others really depends on certain circumstances of a nation.
Government-backed programs and budgets on science subjects can be beneficial for developing and emerging countries who rely on the technology developed by advanced nations. More investment directed to education science means that the schools have more money to build state-of-the-art laboratories and hold competitive scientific competitions. This could encourage more students to choose science as their majors, and thus produces an abundance of labor working in science domains in the future. Given this development in the work force, a developing or emerging country may increase the overall ability to absorb technology from foreign countries, which would eventually boost its productivity and economic development. This can be clearly seen in the case of Vietnam in the early 1990s, when its government decided to allot more capital to science education. This wise investment has brought about unprecedented economic outcomes for this nation, which could not have been obtained if it had not been such correct choice of the Vietnamese state.
However, in terms of the developed countries, merely focusing on science education might not be an optimal choice because what these nations need to boost their economy is beyond the purview of science. While the less developed countries require science knowledge to adapt to the existing technology to produce goods and services, more advanced countries necessitate creativity to create new scientific breakthroughs. Without equal exposure to other subjects that provoke the ability of creating new ideas such as arts, students in these countries may succumb to the dearth of inventing capabilities. The feat directing equal investment to many subjects can be observed in Poland’s education system. Thanks to this balance allocation, this country continuously boasts significant scientific breakthroughs that could enhance its over productivity and other countries’ economic development as well. If Poland state focused more on spreading solely science aspects, it could put a stultifying effect on the country’s development, grinding its economy to a halt.
In conclusion, while it is justifiable for developing and emerging countries’ governments to put more money into science education, an equal financial allocation to all subjects would be a wiser course of action for advanced countries to boost their economic status.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, really, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 8.3376753507 384% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2350.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73170731707 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13847001757 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541463414634 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.1172725339 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.666666667 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26187113465 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972552812292 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403557107992 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167574321242 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373228928331 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, really, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 8.3376753507 384% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2350.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73170731707 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13847001757 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541463414634 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.1172725339 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.666666667 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26187113465 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972552812292 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403557107992 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167574321242 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373228928331 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.