Some employers believe that job applicants social skills are more important than their academic qualifications Do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for your answer include any relevant examples from your experience and knowledge Write a

It is widely believed that the importance of social skills outweighs that of academic certificates in job recruitment. From my perspective, this opinion is totally true.

First and foremost, it is via this way that the employers will unable to sort between real talented applicants and deficient ones. This is due to the fact that nowadays the educational curriculum is becoming easier and easier, resulting in such qualifications becoming achievable day by day. Furthermore, even in some cases, those certificates can be faked, which means that the academic qualifications cannot totally prove a person's ability. Meanwhile, the social skills cannot be faked easily as it can only be achieved through realistic experience that does show a worker's real capability.

The second point is that only by testing employees via social abilities can the employers find out true genius in their field. Since not every applicant has a chance to approach educational programme due to their poor condition, it is harder for them to receive any study certificates. Nevertheless, a lot of them do have realistic experiences that enhance their skills essentials to work such as soft skills or communication ability, as the majority of the impoverished has to be exposed to workplace in order to be financially stable while the others are trying to get academic qualification. Thus, unless companies want to lose the most suitable workers for them, they will have to recruit by social skills.

To conclude, in order to recruit the real talented employees, the employers need to base on social skills to judge, not academic qualifications.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...c qualifications cannot totally prove a persons ability. Meanwhile, the social skills c...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a worker' or simply 'workers'?
Suggestion: a worker; workers
...ugh realistic experience that does show a workers real capability. The second point is...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, so, thus, while, as to, such as, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27307692308 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06318809442 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588461538462 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9527055156 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.636363636 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226104555911 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845885850165 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421769838914 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144967967046 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510928237141 0.056905535591 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.