Nowadays, while some countries are facing difficulties and need help from other countries, it is suggested that government should not spend money on international aid. I partially agree with this opinion and my reason will be explained in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, governments should prioritize supporting their own citizens first of all, instead of sponsoring budget for other countries. The authorities should build more schools, accommodation for inhabitants so that they can have a full and prosperous life, even construct more factories so that jobs are available for its citizens which leads to the decrease unemployment rate. Therefore, setting aside money for citizens will help them all climb their way out of poverty and can facilitate revenue growth for their nation.
On the other hand, people hold the view that governments should financial assistance to the country which is in a difficult situation. The provided overseas fiscal aid will increase solidarity and humanity among international relationships between nations. The authorities can use money to improve things like health care, shelter and food for underprivileged people. Moreover, when recognizing this goodwill gesture, the two countries may later become strategic partners of each other and favorable trade concessions. As a result, their countries will also gain economic benefits, reduce taxes, attract foreign investment and penetrate new markets easily.
To conclude, I am inclined to the viewpoint that the government should dedicate funds to foreign aid because this work is aimed at humanitarian purposes, it also opens many opportunities to develop its own country.
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 78
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 67
- The charts show information about children learning musical instruments in 1996 and 2016 in the UK 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6062992126 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99103792898 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673228346457 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4910126682 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.454545455 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222639207169 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747067466149 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476598590804 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121890618422 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028889961997 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.