The diagram below shows the amount of pork, chicken and beef consumed in the US between 1960 and 2003. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The line chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in the consumption of three different types of meat: pork, beef, and chicken in America over a 44-year period from 1960 to 2003.
In general, despite the fact that the amount of beef consumption surpassed that both pork and chicken in the first three decades, the amount of chicken consumed for the rest of this period of time was always more than the other two categories.
Looking at the graph more closely, one can see that the amount of beef eaten peaked at slightly less than 90 pounds per person in 1975 while that of pork fell to its lowest point for this time period at a little over 40 pounds. Although the consumption of chicken being the least preferred meat from 1960 to the early 1985, chicken then became the most popular types of meat after equalling figures for beef consumption at a little greater than 65 pounds of both meat per head.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-24 | roadtoapro | 67 | view |
- The charts below show how the consumption of various food groups by people in the UK 1942 2004 5 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows time spent watching TV by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts below show how the consumption of various food groups by people in the UK 1942 2004 5 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...f chicken consumed for the rest of this period of time was always more than the other two cate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 755.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60365853659 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21511055099 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.5903944661 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 188.75 112.824112599 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.0 22.9334400587 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154171073772 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101904465539 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421363180744 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121975811486 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310084673097 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.2329268293 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.7 10.3012195122 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.29 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.