All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Gauging the efficacy of a company's performance is an important task in ensuring a bright future for the company, and to make sure that any obstacles or roadblocks in operations are cleared. While taking employee feedback is vital for ensuring reasonable working conditions, it does not reduce the need to hire outside consultants. The central reason for this is the fact that such consultants can give a bigger-picture set of suggestions for the company to adjust its workings; the feedback of the employees can not cover the bigger issues that the company would have at hand.
Consultants generally survey the whole plethora of departments that the company may have, and check everywhere along the supply line, or whatever framework it may be, for ways in which the company can work more effeciently. They don't simply look at a heap of papers and create a solution; they come up with advice for the company in a holistic manner. They may even converse with employees on the ground who manage different departments, gathering valuable information that can help them in making decisions.
Employee feedback does provide a lot of insight in the working of an organization, as they are the very nodes stitched together to form the corporate structure. They may each find ways to improve operations at their own levels, or based on what they observe in the workplace. Such feedback cannot be immediately discounted when consultations are made, but also cannot fully replace the value brought to a company via consultations. Employee feedback is a great tool to improve the company to a finer degree.
Hence, if a company were to start taking feedback from its employees, it does not absolve it of its need for consultants, though it would surely help in making working conditions better for them. By listening to employees, the company not only gets the larger-picture feedback from its consultants, but also benefits from the small-picture (or rather, greater-precision) feedback from the workers themselves.
Thus, the claim that taking employee feedback would make hiring outside consultants unnecessary for a company, for the above reasons, is false. A company can't afford to lose any picture of how well it operates: neither big, nor small. Though, it must be noted that by disagreeing with the claim, this does not justify a company not listening to its employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | Bholuchand | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-23 | bacec | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Adesina Boluwatito | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term We urge all of our clients to invest in this new company For the first time in ten years a company that has developed satellite te 58
- The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora Medical experts say that only one quarter of Corpora s citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness even though twenty years ago one half of all of Corpora s citizens me 80
- Claim The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint Reason Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea Write a respo 66
- Hospital statistics regarding people who go to the emergency room after roller skating accidents indicate the need for more protective equipment Within that group of people 75 percent of those who had accidents in streets or parking lots had not been wear 66
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at DuraSocks Inc A recent study of Dura Socks customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process which ensures that our sock 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...company can work more effeciently. They dont simply look at a heap of papers and cre...
^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a holistic manner" with adverb for "holistic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hey come up with advice for the company in a holistic manner. They may even converse with employees ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 155, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... the above reasons, is false. A company cant afford to lose any picture of how well ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11568123393 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93946026384 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532133676093 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8484080128 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.666666667 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9333333333 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326045112672 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110773272848 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651768717678 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185958975434 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476292686745 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...company can work more effeciently. They dont simply look at a heap of papers and cre...
^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a holistic manner" with adverb for "holistic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hey come up with advice for the company in a holistic manner. They may even converse with employees ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 155, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... the above reasons, is false. A company cant afford to lose any picture of how well ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11568123393 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93946026384 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532133676093 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8484080128 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.666666667 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9333333333 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326045112672 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110773272848 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651768717678 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185958975434 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476292686745 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.