Dating
The nature of dating has changed enormously over the last 20 years. Nevertheless, has it become easier to find your soulmate and fall head over the heels in love?
It is hard to charge about it when you have already met your man/woman behind your heart some years ago. There were great many timesaving gadgets that time and it had already started dating though the social networking. However, we, young people, had some hazard of using all these benefits and carried on meeting new friend at University, on workplace or through the friends and I am not an exception. My husband and I had been studying for 5 years at the same university until we met one another on the job, sitting in front of each other.
These days, adolescents look at the meeting a lifelong companion like some adventure or quest. It is becoming more common not having face-to-face dates, but charting though the Internet or mobile phone, not seeing each other for a long time. As a result, we have far many heartbroken people who have imagined some picture in their head concerning their virtual speakers and then found that reality is inconsistent with their imagination. Moreover, a worse situation is when they try to build relationship with these unsuitable partner understanding that there is every likelihood to start hating your ex’s guts or having it in for them.
It is obvious that when young people grow up to the certain age, they are likely to looking for other ways to find their happiness. Frankly speaking, I may confess of knowing some interesting way to do it – speed dating. Not always, lasting gargets are suited to searching for your soulmate and, to be honest, they take great deal of your time with quite low impact. However, speed dating can save your time; help find not only potential future wife/husband, but also meet a lot of new people who can be your kindred spirits.
Therefore, we have to admit that ways of building relationships have changed. Has it became worse or better? Only you can decide.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-10 | KarinaShine | 87 | view |
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species despite the expense to humans in effort time and financial well being Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money an 70
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 66
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government industry or other fields must be highly competitive Other people claim that in order to be successful a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others 60
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss 50
- Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes 60
Comments
If you decide to use dating…
If you decide to use dating sites to find a man, you have many options. One site that I have had a good experience with is https://datingsite-rate.com/review/onenightfriend/ . This site offers a user-friendly interface and many features to help you connect with like-minded men who are also looking for a meaningful relationship. In addition, the site respects security and privacy, which is very important when it comes to online dating. So if you want to use a dating site to find a man, I would highly recommend reading reviews about this site before registering.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
...the last 20 years. Nevertheless, has it become easier to find your soulmate and fall h...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 86, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[4]
Message: Possible agreement error – use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...ding relationships have changed. Has it became worse or better? Only you can decide. ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e worse or better? Only you can decide.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, frankly, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 5.05154639175 277% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.03092783505 330% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 42.0 32.9175257732 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 937.175257732 178% => OK
No of words: 348.0 206.0 169% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80459770115 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 3.78020617076 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56143145537 2.54303337028 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 127.690721649 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600574712644 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 290.88556701 177% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.13402061856 109% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.2725939731 44.8134815571 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3529411765 76.5299724578 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 16.8248392259 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 4.34317383033 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0896767147456 0.216113520407 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349503397232 0.0766984524023 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785588780797 0.0603063233224 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0600493880649 0.12726935374 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581469509969 0.0580467560999 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 8.37731958763 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 70.7449484536 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 8.71597938144 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 41.2886597938 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 87.0786516854 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.75 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.