Some people believe that social media sites, such as Facebook or Twitter, have negative impacts on young people and their ability to form personal relationships. Others believe that these sites bring people together in a beneficial way.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In recent days, social media sites such as Facebook or Twitter wildly expand and effect on over the world. Especially in the COVID-19 pandemic, there are some arguments that young people over-focus on network platforms which can cause negative consequences and postpone their personal relationships. Otherwise, many people believe that these sites can connect people and bring them together positively. This essay will discuss these conflicting views and give ideas from my perspective.
First of all, those who are passionate about social media sites that lead to argues it can harm users and make bad for their relationships. Young people tend to face their phones focusing on their idols or something entertaining and limiting contact with their relatives. For example, teenagers spend almost time to play Facebook and become angry when parents remind them about that. Many times it can lead to family relationships becoming hurt and far away.
On the other hand, platforms such as Facebook or Twitter can bring benefits to young people. It provides immediate updates on news day by day and adds knowledge for them. For instance, million people use social media to catch the modern generation in these days. Moreover, the sites can become study tools and support learning efficiently.
In conclusion, social media sites have both negative and positive effects on young people. Their relationships can be distracted by the internet. However, it can bring benefits if they use it correctly. From my perspective, if you use the network correctly, it can be useful for your life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'argue'.
Suggestion: argue
...e about social media sites that lead to argues it can harm users and make bad for thei...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... adds knowledge for them. For instance, million people use social media to catch the mo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25296442688 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67819740371 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596837944664 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1379691593 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0625 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8125 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365690101613 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113058923506 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996148535246 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221776302029 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111894584451 0.056905535591 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.