The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
The first chart demonstrates how much British parents spent on their kids' sports from 2008 to 2014, whilst the second graph illustrates the participation figures of British children in football, athletics and swimming during the same timescale. Looking from an overall perspective, it is apparent that parents in Britain tended to pay more for their children to take part in sports. Additionally, throughout the surveyed period, football was the most popular sport among British children.
In terms of British parents' spending on their kids' sports, it was recorded at 20 pounds per month in 2008. The following six years witnessed a steady growth in this amount, increasing by about 12 pounds to reach well over 30 pounds every month at the end of the survey.
Moving to the number of children partaking in sports, there were roughly 8 million choosing football in the first year of the timespan. This number inched down over the next two years, then experienced a gradual rise of more or less 1.5 to end at about 9 million participants in 2014. The numbers of Athletics and swimming participants, in contrast, were significantly lower, at a little over 0 and well under 2.5 million in 2008. While the former remained almost unchanged in the next two years, the latter started to crawl during the same period, then kept on climbing by nearly twofold over the last four years. Nonetheless, a swell of roughly 5 million people was seen in the quantity of Athletics participants from 2010 to 2012, followed by a dwindle in the next two years, making it the second-favored sport among all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-31 | my220904 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | khangoccho | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-13 | felixchen | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 747, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...icipants from 2010 to 2012, followed by a dwindle in the next two years, making it the se...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, nonetheless, second, then, well, while, in contrast, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9328358209 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72348187636 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570895522388 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6970022903 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.2 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315369961682 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118964482987 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894565359739 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205715218697 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127984897955 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.