In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this

Essay topics:

In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this?

In several countries, many people have an increasing fascination with finding out about the history of the place that they live in. This essay will discuss some motivations for this as well as how people can unearth this kind of information.

There are two primary reasons for this phenomenon. The first reason is the concern about potential dangers to the old buildings. Over many decades of being used, the structural soundness of the building can be determined, and it is time for the owners to decide whether they should rebuild it or not. In addition, many people are curious about discovering strange things under their houses such as skeletons of people that passed away or chests of treasure.

There are many methods to explore the history of a building. The most effective way is to check the public records. From these records, we are able to determine how the building was built and the blueprints of the structural integrity of the construction. Another effective method is simply to ask neighbors. In many cases, neighbors have been living in the area for a long time and they can remember exactly who erected the building and have a wealth of information about the history of the residence. Furthermore, houses in the same place often share their characteristics.

In conclusion, there are various ways for finding out the history of the buildings and the main reason why people are interested in them is because of their curiosity. The best way to find out this information is to search the public records or simply ask the neighbors

Votes
Average: 7.1 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-06 Ahmad_off 61 view
2024-08-06 Ahmad_off 61 view
2024-07-25 tronghuy230903 56 view
2024-05-27 AnnaAlysia 84 view
2024-05-22 AnnaAlysia 73 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, in many cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93155893536 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71743173307 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536121673004 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1570559816 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6428571429 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414844411044 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1194647287 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937241747685 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258497506052 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972392227286 0.056905535591 171% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, in many cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93155893536 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71743173307 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536121673004 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1570559816 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6428571429 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414844411044 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1194647287 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937241747685 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258497506052 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972392227286 0.056905535591 171% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.