The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is presumed that ameliorating people’s lives should be science’s top priority. Personally, I firmly support this idea.
Firstly, science has made substantial improvements to healthcare. It can be said that scientific measures have consistently been taken whenever there is a concern about an individual's well-being. Moreover, it is evident that scientists have put in great effort to establish solutions for medical issues. For instance, after acknowledging the problems in relation to a disease called smallpox, the scientist Edward Jenner had gone (went) to great lengths to ease the situations by inventing the world’s first successful vaccine, saving thousands of people’s lives afterwards. This depicts the significance science has on people as inventions and discoveries in this field have been proven to save their lives.
Secondly, science has simultaneously benefited people’s daily activities and careers with its cutting-edge technology. An example to this is how smartphones are constantly being developed to meet consumer’s needs, indicating that technologies are created for people to use effectively and efficiently. It is undeniable that relics used by people today ensued from the plethora of effort and time its creator put into devising and upgrading their inventions, hence the reason why it can be stated that science prioritize the lives of people as they constantly change to adopt to people’s demand.
In conclusion, science has impacted people positively owing to its assistance in treating diseases as well as providing gadgets and technologies for people to use on a daily basis. This consequently means that helping one’s life should be what science prioritize because it has done so. For all of the reasons believe, I believe that science should improve people’s lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...t ameliorating people’s lives should be science’s top priority. Personally, I firmly su...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s cutting-edge technology. An example to this is how smartphones are constantly b...
^^
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
... of people as they constantly change to adopt to people’s demand. In conclusion, scien...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 292, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... prioritize because it has done so. For all of the reasons believe, I believe that science...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60507246377 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11808781862 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.9334624218 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279867968753 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108512004964 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668549591378 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192038971786 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474559659514 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.