The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The picture describes the constitution of an airport now and how it will be after redesigning next year.
Overall, the airport will undergo a number of dramatic changes, the most important of which are going to be the development of a sky train and the expansion of gates.
Initially, a bag drop will be constructed in the west of the departures, replacing the check-in site which was planned to move to the opposite of the bag drop. Another change to make is that the café will be reconstructed in the southwest of the airport. While no changes will be made in the passport control, security, and customs area, a number of shops will be constructed to ensure the demand shopping of customers.
Additionally, the east of this place will also witness numerous differences with another café, an ATM, and a car hire being developed. Eventually, the walkway will be knocked out to make way for a modern sky train which will be accompanied by the appearance of more gates from 1 to 18 in the North of the airport.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-09-08 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 70 | view |
2024-08-16 | ThHuong | 84 | view |
2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 67 | view |
2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
- The pictures below shows process of growing and making products from pineapples 73
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- IN SOME COUNTRIES MOST PEOPLE PREFER TO RENT THEIR HOMES RATHER THAN BUYING THEM WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF RANTING A HOME 67
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 84
- The tables below give the distribution of world population in 1950 and 2000 with an estimate of the situation in 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69832402235 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82611999301 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575418994413 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0950874017 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178790007733 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103083662953 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840208353588 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137806054368 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959466933492 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.