The line graph compares how many visitors to four international museums from 1980 to 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that the numbers of visitors to Louvre was highest and the numbers of visitors to London Science Museum was lowest. Moreover, the figures present how many visitors go to London Science Museum trend to went down, the figures in three other museums went up.
In 1980, the number of visitors to Lourve climbed from 7.9 millions to 9 millions in 1995. Then, the figures decreased slowly in 2000 and continue to rise again between 2000 and 2015. Secondly, the number of visitors to Vatican Museums rocketted rapidly from 4.9 millions to 8.9 millions during 35 years. This compares attraction of this 2 museums to visitors.
The number of visitors to London Science Museum stayed stable between 1980 and 1985, but the figures begin to declined dramatically until 2015.Finally, the number of visitors to shenzhen museum dropped slightly from 3.9 millions to 3.2 millions during the first20 years.However, from 2000 to 2015 the figures went up to 3.9 millions.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Nurbakyt2oo1
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph compares how many visitor...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ternational museums from 1980 to 2015. Overall, it can be seen that the numbe...
^^^
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... museums from 1980 to 2015. Overall, it can be seen that the numbers of visit...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igures in three other museums went up. In 1980, the number of visitors to Lourv...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raction of this 2 museums to visitors. The number of visitors to London Science...
^^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Finally
...gin to declined dramatically until 2015.Finally, the number of visitors to shenzhen mus...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...o 3.2 millions during the first20 years.However, from 2000 to 2015 the figures went up ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...5 the figures went up to 3.9 millions.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03370786517 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55718587436 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.412996462 43.030603864 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252706212011 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127504373769 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775682977201 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192688375059 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639650769166 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.