The pie charts show the reasons people in Great Britain had for visiting art museums in the years 1990 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts show the reasons people in Great Britain had for visiting art museums in the years 1990 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear that purpose of learning and gaining knowledge was the most popular for visiting art museums over two years. Besides, as noticable was that two reasons having the least visiter were buying art and others.
Look at the pie charts more closely, one can see that to learn and gain knowledge was the dominant purpose of all purposes, accounting for approximately 45 percent in the researched years. Whereas the reason of filling their travel schedules was the most second reason that attracted people to go to art museums in 1990, but the percentage of this reason about roughly from 27 percent to 12 percent by 2000. In addition, there was an increasing trend in two purpose of spending time with friends and family, and attending a special exhibit from 12 percent in each reason to 17 percent and 18 percent, respectively. Finally, to buy art was the least attractive reason, hitting a low of 1 percent in 1990 but it sharply surge to 5 percent, surpassing the purpose of others in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 720, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'surges'?
Suggestion: surges
...low of 1 percent in 1990 but it sharply surge to 5 percent, surpassing the purpose of...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, look, second, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72959183673 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50756352737 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566326530612 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.3377574387 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268464044915 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173272886893 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.201617624575 0.0843802449381 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308478403049 0.15604864568 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.246423698045 0.0819641961636 301% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.