The reading material mentions some problems that people will face during the mission of sending humans to Mars. While the lecturer disagrees with the reading material on several points.
The author states that a round-trip to Mars will take at least 2 years, and the cargo capacity isn't sufficient to carry enough food, water, and oxygen at once. The lecturer disagrees with this opinion by saying that astronauts now can use a technique called hydroponic, which allows them to cultivate plants in water in the spaceship. Plants will recycle wastewater and release oxygen for the spaceship.
Secondly, the reading argues that living in a zero-gravity environment for months will bring some negative impacts on astronauts. While this statement cannot hold water. The professor says until now, humans have established several space stations, and there are some astronauts already learned how to use techniques to manage these negative impacts. For example, they can do regular exercise to prevent the muscle mass from decreasing and use other methods to keep bone density.
Thirdly, the reading proposes that astronauts will be exposed to dangerous levels of space radiation during the mission to Mars. And it is impossible to install a shield for the spaceship because it is too heavy. The teacher denies this by pointing out that space radiation isn't at a dangerous level all the time. Only when the sun is active, the level of radiation is dangerous. Besides, we can construct some monitors to keep an eye on the level of radiation. Adding a small shield is also possible for a spaceship. Astronauts can stay in this small shield when the radiation level is dangerous and in normal space when the level is safe.
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is Thus the project o 3
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs Many pterosaurs were very large some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the mission of sending humans to Mars. While the lecturer disagrees with the reading...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...t least 2 years, and the cargo capacity isnt sufficient to carry enough food, water,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ng some negative impacts on astronauts. While this statement cannot hold water. The p...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...is by pointing out that space radiation isnt at a dangerous level all the time. Only...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, at least, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06360424028 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5798150741 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551236749117 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1048582895 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5625 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0516163321613 0.272083759551 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0167219819888 0.0996497079465 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.022671121671 0.0662205650399 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0341209921068 0.162205337803 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013746238346 0.0443174109184 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.