The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age groups used to get daily news in one country in 2011

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age groups used to get daily news in one country in 2011

The bar chart gives information about how many people used to get daily news by the types of media of different age groups in one country in 2011.

Overall, it is clear that people used to Micro blogging and Social networks trend to drop when people get older. On the order hand, Radio was the most chosen when people get order.

Looking at the data of two youngest groups, the percentage of people aged 10-17 and 18-29 who used social networks was the same, at 80%. Likewise, the proportion of people aged 10-17 using micro blogging was nearly similar to figure for people aged 18-29, at under 25%. Meanwhile, radio was used by over 90% of people aged 18-29, which was significantly higher than those aged 10-17.

As for the reamaining age groups, 90% of people aged 30-40 and 50-64 listened to the radio to get daily news while the figure for the oldest was slighly lower. In addition, 45% of people aged 30-40 used social media, which was around 13 % and 35% higher than those aged 50-64 a and above 65. Besides, micro blogging accounted for under 20% of people in three age groups.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-10 nobitaa 67 view
2023-09-12 nguyentuancn13@gmail.com 73 view
2023-07-16 17142052@student.hcmute.edu.vn 84 view
2023-03-08 giangngoc 78 view
2022-11-24 giangngoc 78 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, likewise, look, so, while, as for, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62051282051 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09819218709 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528205128205 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6744175568 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.111111111 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389495568909 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190080800205 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.193528922357 0.0843802449381 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308092178057 0.15604864568 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.244740030708 0.0819641961636 299% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, likewise, look, so, while, as for, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62051282051 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09819218709 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528205128205 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6744175568 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.111111111 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389495568909 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190080800205 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.193528922357 0.0843802449381 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308092178057 0.15604864568 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.244740030708 0.0819641961636 299% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.