The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013

The line graph illustrates the number of people who went to 3 museums in London: British Museum, Science Museum and Natural History Museum from June to September in 2013.

Overall, the British Museum was the most preferred museum, while the Science Museum was the least preferred one. In the end of the summer, the number of visitors to the British Museum and the Science Museum went up, whereas the figure for the Natural History Museum showed an opposite trend.

In June 2013, there were 600 and 400 thousands of visitors going to the British Museum and the Science Museum, respectively. The figure for visitors who came to the British Museum reached a peak at about 750 thousands in July, compared to around 350 thousands of people coming to the Science Museum. The month August witnessed a sudden decline in the number of visitors to both museums, to 500 thousands visitors to the British Museum and 300 thousands to the Science Museum. After that, the figures for 2 museums rose up dramatically, by 150 thousands.

On the other hand, the number of visitors to the Natural History Museum decreased significantly, from about 550 thousands in June to below 400 thousands in the next month. The figure remained the same in August, then went up remarkably to nearly 500 thousands in the end of the summer.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '400 thousand'.
Suggestion: 400 thousand
...nd. In June 2013, there were 600 and 400 thousands of visitors going to the British Museum an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '350 thousand'.
Suggestion: 350 thousand
...0 thousands in July, compared to around 350 thousands of people coming to the Science Museum. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87053571429 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50311906831 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441964285714 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4268503877 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.222222222 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295583948577 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148529579833 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101615582235 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217066912935 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900214964595 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '400 thousand'.
Suggestion: 400 thousand
...nd. In June 2013, there were 600 and 400 thousands of visitors going to the British Museum an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '350 thousand'.
Suggestion: 350 thousand
...0 thousands in July, compared to around 350 thousands of people coming to the Science Museum. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87053571429 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50311906831 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441964285714 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4268503877 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.222222222 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295583948577 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148529579833 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101615582235 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217066912935 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900214964595 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.