In the past, important knowledge about history and culture was stored in museums. However, today, people can see everything on the internet without paying any money. Therefore, we no longer need museums.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
One school of thought holds that with the proliferation of information on the Internet, people can effortlessly view everything they wish, including historical and cultural knowledge without charge, so it is no longer necessary to keep museums. While acknowledging the reasons for this thinking, I would argue that museums will still be irreplaceable.
On the one hand, it is understandable why some people believe that museums will be made redundant. The primary reason for this is that the Internet provides people with numerous materials and resources related to history and culture without requiring them to travel long distances to museums. For instance, just with a click of a button, they can have an image of various artifacts from different historical periods, making it possible for them to expand their history knowledge. Given this factor, the belief that museums will be superseded by the Internet seems justifiable.
On the other hand, I am convinced that museums will still have a role to play. First, it is worth mentioning that if people continued to seek knowledge about culture and history online, the profits of museums would be lowered, thereby hindering the development of the world’s economy. By purchasing tickets to visit those places, people might contribute to the stimulation of economic growth. In addition to this, museums are of paramount importance to people’s physical experience, as seen in a way they directly explore and observe artifacts, long-standing statues, and artworks, resulting in a proper perspective on historical knowledge. To be more specific, unverified information floating around the Internet might lead to some misunderstandings, such as people’s mistaken views and information of historical figures and events, which strengthens the arguments that keeping museums is still an important task.
In conclusion, while there are justifications that museums will be marginalized by the Internet, I would contend that the former will remain essential in the future, considering their important roles in developing economies and individuals’ better understanding of knowledge about history and culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | tteruchan65 | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | imvietnamese | 77 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, then, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60975609756 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1528753767 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557926829268 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.7776352231 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.333333333 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259784340584 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977566774134 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450662355157 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168156102455 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031414066338 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.