Many people aspire to a balance between work and other parts of their lives, but few achieve it. What are the problems in trying to achieve this and how can these problems be overcome?
It is true that achieving a balanced lifestyle among professional and personal life is an essential aspiration that has bolstered many individuals seeking but a few gaining. In this essay, I will delve into two crucial factors driving this fact as well as suggesting some methods to refine problems involved.
Starting from employees’ initial motivations, their jobs serve not only as a sustainable financial support but also as a way to achieve their prestige and their career growth. Pursuing those motivations within the limited span of a 24-hour day puts workers at the expense of other life aspects, such as relationships and healthcare, if they live with the desire to materialize their dreams. Furthermore, Work has been increasingly expansive in terms of both workloads and physical workplace boundaries, driven by the advancement of technology and the widespread availability of the internet which allows ready access from any corner of the planet. For example, with the allure of monthly salary as a worker’s major motivation, it is irresistible to stay in touch with their managers or their customers through messenger or phone call, even though employees are staying on vacation in another country.
After scrutinizing the two main reasons mentioned above, those seeking a more healthy lifestyle could go further in the aspiration of balancing between work and ordinary life. Firstly, reevaluating their dreams plays a crucial role in navigating their lifestyle and re-scheduling their daily timetable. Accompanying with minimizing the important position of their career, relationships and well-being should also be prioritized as their indispensable links in an individual life chain. Secondly, being encouraged to deny calls or messages from work relationships by turning off personal computers and phones is also a practice acquired during the amusing moment of vacation.
In conclusion, while it is true that work brings immeasurable benefits to workers, it is genuine only when workers know how to balance workplace, family place and personal private place by underscoring the boundaries among those places not only physically but also temporally, such as limiting their career desire and the influence of technology.
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- the plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year 78
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people say that drug companies have a responsibility to spend money on researching medicines that will help people in poorer countries Others say the main responsibility of drug companies is to make money Discuss both these views and give your own op 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52325581395 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06613156774 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633720930233 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0682807071 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.727272727 106.682146367 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2727272727 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5454545455 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222700369216 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771118153694 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387247250054 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125473440819 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495122428529 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 13.0946893788 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.33 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52325581395 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06613156774 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633720930233 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0682807071 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.727272727 106.682146367 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2727272727 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5454545455 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222700369216 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771118153694 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387247250054 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125473440819 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495122428529 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 13.0946893788 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.33 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.