Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Constructing sporting facilities for individuals is gradually fractious common. Several international achievements related to sports were made by providing sporting institutions for professional sportsmen rather than for all inhabitants. In my opinion, this can comprise both advantageous and disadvantageous aspects. In this essay below, I will discuss and elucidate in detail.
In terms of the adverse side, the main influence of this phenomenon is that it can bring severe potential health risks for humans. It is true that not having access to sporting institutions, can cause a sedentary lifestyle for them. There are several people who are overweight, are extremely hard to lose weight following simple therapies, for example. Hence, if they do not have the opportunity to access institutions continuously, it can cause obesity as well as several corollaries afterward such as cardiovascular diseases.
However, this situation also has a beneficial side. A country with expertisation related to sports can bring a reputation for both professional athletes and this nation. For instance, in the city center of Japan, Tokyo established 50 training constructions for sumo wrestling which is one of the most well-known traditional sports in the world. Sumo not only creates a reputation for wrestlers but also for Japan which is a worthy destination for travelers with abundant historical and traditional values.
In conclusion, the fact of underpinning sport specifical buildings cultivates the competitive ability for people who have expertise in several special sports rather than country inhabitants which also bring reputation for that nation although it also potentially risk causing health problems for people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-18 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | thaokim2003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | Cuberates | 73 | view |
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 89
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- Discuss the issues surrounding the lack of funding for schools in low income areas What solutions can be proposed to address this 89
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 78
- Nowadays celebrities earn money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... will discuss and elucidate in detail. In terms of the adverse side, the main inf...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71206225681 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24956541595 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610894941634 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7838435517 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.923076923 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173476586552 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762374940529 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543551225567 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120608725225 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622725694368 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.