The school curriculum plays a very important role in choosing their career. Each student have different aptitude and finding out their interest is very crucial. Also the student group consist of differently abled as well which requires special attention. So considering all this, the nation should not have same curriculum for all its student till college.
Each students have different comprehensive ability and designing curriculum in consideration of it is important. Some students will be able to understand topics easily whereas for others it will be involved. For example, sam, a student who has high comprehensive ability will find the topics which is considered as difficult for others as very easy. If there was a curriculum designed for students like sam, they would greater heights in future.
Having a standardised curriculum means students exposure to different topics would be limited. This will give students a harder time in finding their interest. For instance, if the school curriculum supports only one type of sport then students who have a natural talent for other sports would be losing their chance in nurturing themself. Thus having different curriculum in different schools would be very helpful for them.
Making the schools have same curriculum could help some students have access to topics which may not be known to them before. Like in the case of a student who is from a poor family condition could benefit from this as he/she will be exposed to topics which were not accessible before.
In conclusion, having non standardised curriculum is more advantageous than a standardised curriculum. Students would be able to more easily find their interest and also deal with topics of their caliber.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and suppo 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasonin 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and suppo 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and suppo 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The school curriculum plays a very impor...
^^^
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
... in choosing their career. Each student have different aptitude and finding out thei...
^^^^
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ing out their interest is very crucial. Also the student group consist of differentl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...um for all its student till college. Each students have different comprehensi...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...um for all its student till college. Each students have different comprehensive a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ts like sam, they would greater heights in future. Having a standardised curriculum...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey would greater heights in future. Having a standardised curriculum means s...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ools would be very helpful for them. Making the schools have same curriculum ...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s which were not accessible before. In conclusion, having non standardised c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, then, thus, well, whereas, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 277.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26714801444 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75723897611 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505415162455 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6331739778 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.1875 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164443069846 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702619017772 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574855686756 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106687247284 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486515215827 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.