It is generally agreed that society benefits from the work of its members. Compare the contributions of artists to society with the contributions of scientists to society. Which type of contribution do you think is valued more by your society? Give specific reasons to support your answer.
Scientist and artists are the two important group of our modern society; so, which of them has more value? Everyone will answer this question based on his/her own characters, emotional concerns or educational backgrounds. Since a logical response requires an accurate analyses from both sides, I claim that role of scientists is more effective for our society; thus, I present the following justifications.
The first and the most significant aspect that we must consider is that Tele-communications were invented and improved by scientists, while even critics can't raise question on this point. Tele-communications, such as e-mails and mobile phones facilitates human lives and nowadays living without this options is impossible for everyone. People can save considerable amount of money and time by applying Tele communication in their life, thanks to scientists. Moreover, they can keep in touch with their friends and family from all over the world besides making new friends through the internet. As you can see, this is a magnificent invention of scientists for us which made a superior life, and we should appreciate their efforts.
Another noteworthy aspect that should be addressed in this ongoing explanation is that scientists made faster and better circumstances for transportation, meanwhile, underestimating this comment will deprive us from a perfect judgment. Invention of the cars and plants, was a huge step in facilitating the transportation and traveling, which resulted to creating many opportunities for people around the world. People in this current modern society can't go further in their works without utilizing these equipment for traveling, and we can consider cars as the most essential things for our life.
Admittedly, there are some good contributions of the artists for society too, and we shouldn't be unaware of this point. A great painting from an experienced artists can make people to enjoy and admire it, however, I believe that people can enjoy the nature more than a painting. Also, scientists can create many amazing painting with LED lamps that are as attractive as painting of an artist.
To sum up, I don't deny that artists contributed for our society, but taking all the factors into account and careful analyzing all aspects, I assert that scientists had a vital value for our community.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2016-04-08 | younes.tatari | 80 | view |
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree It is easier for parents to raise children than it was 50 years ago 80
- Topic: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who just focus on only one skill. 73
- TPO 5 Integrated essay 70
- Some people believe that students should be given one long vacation each year Others believe that students should have several short vacations throughout the year Which viewpoint do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 79
I claim that role of scientists is more effective
I claim that the role of scientists is more effective
Tele-communications, such as e-mails and mobile phones facilitates human lives
Tele-communications, such as e-mails and mobile phones facilitate human lives
Sentence: Tele-communications, such as e-mails and mobile phones facilitates human lives and nowadays living without this options is impossible for everyone.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and options
Invention of the cars and plants, was a huge step
the Invention of the cars and plants was a huge step
flaws:
Need to compare more in the second and third paragraphs:
'Compare the contributions of artists to society with the contributions of scientists to society.'
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 373 350
No. of Characters: 1923 1500
No. of Different Words: 216 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.395 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.155 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.011 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 143 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 74 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.867 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.691 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.533 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.325 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.589 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.142 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5